Hi Ravi,

Copied to the group for instruction purposes.

If the scope is fully calibrated, perhaps. My scope does not have the precision 
needed for aligning a PLL. Especially true when it’s a voltage-controlled 
oscillator.

The first tuning point is to have 8V at 110MHz using both a frequency counter 
and a RF voltmeter. The next alignment is for 170mV at 36 MHz.

Here’s my bench meter:

https://www.rigolna.com/products/digital-multimeters/dm3000/dm3068/ 
<https://www.rigolna.com/products/digital-multimeters/dm3000/dm3068/>

As great as it is, it does not work at RF and here’s why:

All digital meters perform INTEGRATION over time to determine the voltage. The 
Rigol or an Agilent or Fluke - all have really fast and solid integration 
circuits. But the limit is imposed by the speed of the signal. 100MHz is 
operating faster than the digital integrators can react. Also, most DMMs have 
relatively LOW impedance and load the circuit under test. You garden variety 
DMMs are in the 100k-ohm range. At these frequencies, the test leads themselves 
have reactance that affects measurement.

An Analog meter integrates as a function of the electronics themselves. I have 
an analog meter, but it is powered by the circuit under test and loads the 
circuit. It rectifies the AC into DC for the meter movement. Again, the 
impedance is low.

A vacuum tube voltmeter presents a very high impedance to the circuit under 
test - usually > 10Meg Ohms. It uses a bridge circuit of vacuum tubes that is 
very sensitive and a good unit can read accurately at fractions of a volt. They 
have  a test probe just like an oscilloscope.

*

My workaround may be to use a Schottky diode with a small cap - 10nanofarad to 
rectify the RF for the DMM. Alternatively, I could try to get a 170mv reference 
voltage using an adjustable source to calibrate the oscilloscope trace and then 
do the measurement.

I hope everyone learned something from this thread <grin> And yes, a $5000 test 
monitor would do it all…

73!!!

B
> On Jun 19, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Ravi Patrick Ratnala via BVARC 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hey Bill,
> 
> Wouldn't an oscilloscope be the best tool for the job here?
> 
> Alternatively - I just picked up a couple of these to serve as backups for my 
> Fluke 117 - only $20, and just horsing around, I've already measured 
> frequencies up to 144 MHz:  https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B015OFMUYO 
> <https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B015OFMUYO>
> 
> 73!
> 
> Ravi
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jun 19, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Bill Crowell, N4HPG via BVARC <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Howdy All,
>> 
>> Does anyone have a vacuum tube voltmeter that can be borrowed/purchased? 
>> Including the probe.
>> 
>> Doing PLL alignment and I need to measure at 100MHz. Your normal AC 
>> voltmeter does NOT work at these frequencies.
>> 
>> 73
>> Bill Crowell, N4HPG
>> Pearland, TX
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> I prefer to live a life of galvanic isolation.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BVARC mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org 
>> <http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Bill Crowell, N4HPG
Pearland, TX
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
I prefer to live a life of galvanic isolation.

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to