Years ago, A power station in North Dakota had a DC power line built through Minnesota. The farmers were 'up in arms' about this. There was a scheduled turn on date and then the farmers started to complain about cattle, chickens dying etc. Except the turn on date was postponed due to technical difficulties... so the complaints were false... Farmers started to topple high tension towers then someone had the bright idea to sell the transmission to the Federal government. The next tower fell down and the FBI, IRS and state and federal inspectors for this, that and everything else came out. Easy find was finding heating fuel [untaxed and illegal] in tractors. That tower toppling came to an end
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:43 PM, ricki tavi via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > Better Call Saul tv show has a main character with this medical condition. > > > If rf causes problems, why not light??? > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016, Paul Easter via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Having worked around very high level rf fields all my life I have a hard >> time with this. The items mentioned use very low power levels. >> >> I would like to see some double blind testing of the people that are >> sensitive to RF. >> >> >> On Jun 30, 2016 11:12 AM, "Irv Smith via BVARC" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> In an engineering magazine I just read a disturbing article about EMF >>> problems associated with everyday modern things such as cellphones, WiFi, >>> Bluetooth, baby monitors, and smart electric meters. I couldn't find the >>> article itself online, but this TED talk covers the same ground: >>> >>> https://www.emfanalysis.com/tedx-wireless-wake-up-call/. >>> >>> Apparently the author is unusually sensitive to such low level EMF. He >>> experienced bad effects attributed to a bank of smart electric meters >>> installed near his apartment's bedroom. Note that his wife is a medical >>> doctor and also suffered various aliments. >>> >>> Many of us keep our cellphones in shirt or pants pocket. We've all been >>> warned that this should be a big no-no. Baby monitors are alleged to be >>> especially bad for a infant whose growing tissues may be unusually >>> susceptible to EMF. What about a pregnant woman with cellphone in a purse >>> carried next to her abdomen? >>> >>> The speaker points out that research on EMF that's funded by the cell >>> industry is not likely to find any problems — analogous to >>> tobacco-industry-funded research on smoking some years ago. And I haven't >>> yet seen any ominous ads by law firms saying "Call 800-xxx-yyyy if you used >>> a baby monitor!" >>> >>> 73 de Irv KK5QQ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BVARC mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > >
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
