Bill, get your facts straight before you blast this "turnover". The only thing here is a turnover of the domain naming system at the highest level. That level includes such monikers as .com, .org; .edu and so on. I have no problem with that.
Anyone for a .ham domain? Jon On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Bill Crowell, N4HPG via BVARC < [email protected]> wrote: > All, > > I am profoundly disturbed by the amount of blatant censorship going on. > Youtube is censoring. Michael Savage was taken off the air. I would expect > Rush and others to follow shortly. Even a Huffington Post writer who > published an article that they didn’t like was fired and ALL of his content > was scrubbed. > > Dasha (my XYL) says this is just like in the good old days of Communist > Czechoslovakia. > > With Obama turning over the control of the Internet to the UN in 3 days, > it is likely that we will have massive disruptions. > > Since the very early 1990s, ICANN has operated a trusteeship that makes > the web work. They have done an excellent job and I want them to stay in > charge, but that’s me. > > It occurred to me that it is practically impossible to censor ham radio. > I’m encouraging folks to get receivers that will work on our bands so that > information can still get out. > > I’ve started a series of posts on my blog: n4hpg.wordpress.com with the > prefix VOTR > > Spread the word. > > Bill Crowell, N4HPG > Pearland, TX > [email protected] > “The SlipStream isn’t the best way to travel faster than the speed of > light, it’s just the only way.” - Dylan Hunt > > > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > >
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
