That is a great idea. Unfortunately, I am not in his district. Ted Poe is my 
Rep. 

 

73,

Ron, K5HM

 <mailto:k5hm....@gmail.com> k5hm....@gmail.com

 <http://www.qrz.com/db/k5hm> www.qrz.com/db/k5hm



        Excelsior!

 

From: BVARC [mailto:bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org] On Behalf Of mark janzer via BVARC
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:54 AM
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org>
Cc: mark janzer <k5...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [BVARC] The emminent demise of Amateur Radio - - Re: HR 555 
Amateur Radio Parity Act --- REBORN

 

Since many BVARC members are his constituents, it may be a good idea to request 
a meeting with him at his Sugarland office, near the Fluor campus.

  _____  

From: mark janzer via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> >
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> 
> 
Cc: mark janzer <k5...@yahoo.com <mailto:k5...@yahoo.com> >
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [BVARC] The emminent demise of Amateur Radio - - Re: HR 555 
Amateur Radio Parity Act --- REBORN

 

For what it's worth, the Sugarland rep, Pete Olson, serves on the Energy and 
Commerce committee. 

When the bill was re-introduced, it was sent to this committee for mark-up...

 

Mark

K5MGJ

  _____  

From: mark janzer via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> >
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> 
>; JP Pritchard <jppn...@comcast.net <mailto:jppn...@comcast.net> > 
Cc: mark janzer <k5...@yahoo.com <mailto:k5...@yahoo.com> >
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [BVARC] The emminent demise of Amateur Radio - - Re: HR 555 
Amature Radio Parity Act --- REBORN

 

Per the home page article, the ARRL board is meeting to discuss the bill on 
January 20th and 21st.

 

Inform the board (and your representatives), that the bill as written, will 
have unintended detrimental consequences to the licensee: 

 

1.      Due to indefinite inaction or delay of an HOA (not as a result of 
failure) to enact reasonable rules and/or permit an antenna. 

2.      The bill does not define the steps to HOA approval. In that quixotic 
hurdles can be required of the licensee as part of the HOA approval process.

3.      That guidance is lacking and should be provided "concerning height, 
location, size, and aesthetic impact of, and installation requirements for, 
outdoor antennas and support structures for the purpose of conducting 
communications" before the bill is passed.

 

Mark

K5MGJ

  _____  

From: K5IZO via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> >
To: JP Pritchard <jppn...@comcast.net <mailto:jppn...@comcast.net> > 
Cc: K5IZO <k5...@yahoo.com <mailto:k5...@yahoo.com> >; BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR 
RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> >
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [BVARC] The emminent demise of Amateur Radio - - Re: HR 555 
Amature Radio Parity Act --- REBORN

 

J P, the incredible thing is that ARRL strongly favors this. They will put the 
full-court press on again to pass it like they did last time.

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, JP Pritchard <jppn...@comcast.net 
<mailto:jppn...@comcast.net> > wrote:

Does ARRL try to involve radio and antenna manufacturers and sellers in this 
effort?  This sounds like a natural connection to get some lobbying done in 
support of modifying the legislation or killing it. If they don't get involved, 
they're out of business, at least when it comes to ham radio gear.

 

JP Pritchard

KG3JPP

 

  _____  

From: BVARC [mailto:bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org] On Behalf Of Gmail via BVARC
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:37 AM
To: John Chauvin; BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
Cc: Gmail
Subject: Re: [BVARC] The emminent demise of Amateur Radio - - Re: HR 555 
Amature Radio Parity Act --- REBORN

I guess I am going to have to convert to cb.  Anybody got a 1 candle linear for 
sale?

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 18, 2017, at 6:43 AM, John Chauvin via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org 
<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> > wrote:

 

I thank Jeffrey for pointing this out.  I have subsequently read it on ARRL's 
home page.

 

This is truly a sad day.  This certainly is the last nail in the coffin of 
amateur radio.

 

If you haven't read it, please read the article in the BVARC Newsletter, 
October 2016, Page 3.  Go to www.bvarc.org <http://www.bvarc.org%2c/>  and  
click on "club newsletters" in the left column of the home page.

 

The very short version is that 

a) Unless already pre-approved, it will be illegal (AGAINST FEDERAL LAW not 
just against deed restrictions) for anyone living in an HOA community to put up 
even a stealth antenna prior to receiving approval from an HOA.  Per attorney 
interpretation, as there is no grandfather clause, even such existing antennas 
must come down.

b) no one will EVER get approval from any HOA.

c) accordingly, home base operation will virtually cease to exist in HOA 
communities.

 

Many of us, and more importantly many prospective hams, that live under the axe 
of an HOA, we would be limited to mobile, portable or remote ops for day-to-day 
on-the-air activities.  Imagine what that will do to us, but more importantly 
to the prospect of drawing new people into amateur radio.

 

I reiterate, please read the article.

 

Amateur Radio, it's been a good ride.  RIP.

 

John, K5IZO

 

 


  _____  


From: Jeffery MacMillian via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> >
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org <mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> 
> 
Cc: Jeffery MacMillian <twi...@gmail.com <mailto:twi...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:05 AM
Subject: [BVARC] HR 555 Amature Radio Parity Act --- REBORN

 

Did anyone else notice what showed backup in congress as HR 555  (Just a bit 
miss labeled and should be HR 666) Here we go again. 

 

 

 

 

SB QST @ ARL $ARLB005
ARLB005 New "Amateur Radio Parity Act" Bill Introduced in US House
of Representatives

ZCZC AG05
QST de W1AW
ARRL Bulletin 5  ARLB005
>From ARRL Headquarters
Newington CT  January 17, 2017
To all radio amateurs

SB QST ARL ARLB005
ARLB005 New "Amateur Radio Parity Act" Bill Introduced in US House
of Representatives

H.R. 555 - a new "Amateur Radio Parity Act" bill - has been
introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill's language
is identical to that of the 2015 measure, H.R. 1301, which passed in
the House late last summer but failed in the waning days of the US
Senate to gain the necessary support. As with H.R. 1301, the new
measure introduced on January 13 in the 115th Congress was sponsored
by Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), with initial co-sponsorship by Rep.
Joe Courtney (D-CT) and Rep. Greg Walden, W7EQI (R-OR). Walden now
chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, to which the new
bill has been referred. H.R. 555 will get an initial airing in the
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology. When H.R. 1301 came
up in committee, Walden spoke forcefully in favor of the measure,
which ultimately attracted 126 House cosponsors.

Information on H.R. 555 can be found on the web at,
 <https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/555?r=27> 
https://www.congress.gov/bill/ 115th-congress/house-bill/555? r=27 .

"Rep. Kinzinger has again stepped forward to introduce this
important legislation," said ARRL CEO Tom Gallagher, NY2RF.
"Kinzinger's commitment stems from exposure to what the Amateur
Radio community brings to the service of all communities. The ARRL
and radio amateurs nationwide owe Rep. Kinzinger a resounding 'Thank
You!' for his efforts on their behalf."

H.R. 555 calls on the FCC to establish rules prohibiting the
application of deed restrictions that preclude Amateur Radio
communications on their face or as applied. Deed restrictions would
have to impose the minimum practicable restriction on Amateur Radio
communications to accomplish the lawful purposes of homeowners
association seeking to enforce the restriction.

The ARRL Board of Directors is expected to discuss the pending
legislation when it meets January 20-21.
NNNN
/EX

 

 

Have Fun,

Jeff

KG5LRP


_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org <mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org



_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org <mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

 

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org <mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

 

 

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org <mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

 

 

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org <mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> 
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

 

_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to