In so much as the RFC is considerably less than the LMR by almost 50% makes me wonder if indeed it is less performance wize than the LMR. I have looked around for the specs on RFC but haven't found anything...but have found specs on the LMR stating loss per foot on cable runs. That within it's self make me think why is RFC specs not published??
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Gary Sitton via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > Gayle: > > As long as it's Flexible, and it appears to be, it's > OK. I got as mess'o Wilson 400 which is not flexible > but can be used for long, permanent runs. You'll > need the Flexible 400UF for rotating and crank up > beams. > > 73s, > Gary Sitton, K5AMH > [email protected] > > On 8/14/2017 13:22, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote: > > Is the Shireen RFC 400UF the same as the Times LMR400UF? > > > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing > [email protected]http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to [email protected]
