The antenna is a "horse fence" antenna.   Google it.    15+ strands of #30
stainless wire, separated from each other and woven into a 1.5" wide strip
of plastic webbing....like a folding beach chair web.

So I was looking for the magic that was claimed.  After all y'alls
comments, one on one discussions and revisiting the web sites marketing
material and youtube videos, I certainly did not find it..

In the end, the multiple wires provide only a wider useable bandwidth on 80
meters.  Other bands too but 80 is the bandwidth eater.  No other normal
antenna attributes are affected.    The you tube video shows the antenna as
a mutiple band 80, 40, 20, 10 antenna and after listening to the video a
few times it is only by the use of an in shack ATU (tuner) that you get
"flat" SWR on 40 and 20.  (That is another sore subject with me, but later).

80 meters, the fundamental band of resonance, requires no matching network,
just like a normal, single wire 1/2 wl dipole.   The useable 3:1 SWR
bandwidth on 80 is pretty good at about 200 KHz...maybe a bit more
depending on how high you put it up.    A single wire dipole bandwidth is
around 50 to 75 KHz  3:1 swr if you're lucky.

So, in NEC modeling this antenna I did a bandwidth comparative model for a
single wire and found that a single, copper wire antenna had to have a wire
diameter of about 4 inches to have  the similar bandwidth result.   Of
course, there is no wire 4" in diameter available at Home Depot, so a
multi-wire "Cage" dipole, as a few had mentioned, is the way to go for
equivalence.

I guess the benefit of the Horse Feather antenna is that it is a single
1.5" wide material that is easily deployed.  No putzing around with 15
individual wires, just one interwoven web deployment on each side of the
dipole.

If this is something you think you can use......go to

http://kf4bwg.com/     Horse Fence Antenna

or if you wish to build it yourself....material etc. can be had at

https://www.statelinetack.com/item/safe-fence-1-1-2in-wide-poly-tape-200-ft/SLT700567/
 Fencing material.  They also have the end, wire connection  clamps

I appreciate all that chimed in to set me straight.   Kurt Sterba in World
Radio Magazine years ago used to write a column debunking the claims of the
fly by night antenna manufacturers.  I wish he were still around so he
could comment on this horse feather antenna.  Also, e-ham has a few
differing reviews posted.

TNX ES 73.....Rick -- W5RH

Rick Hiller
*e-mail:     [email protected] <[email protected]>*
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
Get on the air - 146.94 Repeater
Volunteer now for the Houston Hamfest

BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to