Well, I guess I need to break down and purchase a field strength meter to see 
what kind of RF I’m nuking myself with.  50 watts digital going through my 
condo’s rain gutter downspout.  Bet I’m really cooking myself good.  😊

Mike – KG4NDS

From: BVARC <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jeff Greer via BVARC
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 11:08 AM
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Greer <[email protected]>
Subject: [BVARC] From yesterday's ARRL Letter - RF Exposure

Updated Radio Frequency Exposure Rules Become Effective on May 3


The FCC has announced that rule changes detailed in a lengthy 2019 Report and 
Order<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.fcc.gov%2Fpublic%2Fattachments%2FFCC-19-126A1.pdf&data=04%7C01%7C%7C548f41d1506d438a393708d900f1dee1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637541861088645494%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=GyWbxwHH%2Fg92h1Rzf%2FnlQTdrG8qRdokc5HIim6d2Ez0%3D&reserved=0>
 (R&O) governing RF exposure standards go into effect on May 3, 2021. The new 
rules do not change existing RF exposure (RFE) limits but do require that 
stations in all services, including amateur radio, be evaluated against 
existing limits, unless they are exempted. For stations already in place, that 
evaluation must be completed by May 3, 2023. After May 3 of this year, any new 
station, or any existing station modified in a way that's likely to change its 
RFE profile -- such as different antennas or placement, or greater power -- 
will need to conduct an evaluation by the date of activation or change.



"In the RF Report and Order, the Commission anticipated that few parties would 
have to conduct reevaluations under the new rules and that such evaluations 
will be relatively straightforward," the FCC said in an April 2 Public Notice. 
"It nevertheless adopted a 2-year period for parties to verify and ensure 
compliance under the new rules."

The Amateur Service is no longer categorically excluded from certain aspects of 
the rules, as amended, and licensees can no longer avoid performing an exposure 
assessment simply because they are transmitting below a given power level.



"For most amateurs, the major difference is the removal of the categorical 
exclusion for amateur radio, which means that ham station owners must determine 
if they either qualify for an exemption or must perform a routine environmental 
evaluation," said Greg Lapin, N9GL, Chair of the ARRL RF Safety Committee and a 
member of the FCC Technological Advisory Council (TAC).



"Ham stations previously excluded from performing environmental evaluations 
will have until May 3, 2023, to perform these. After May 3, 2021, any new 
stations or those modified in a way that affects RF exposure must comply before 
being put into service," Lapin said.



The December 2019 RF R&O changes the methods that many radio services use to 
determine and achieve compliance with FCC limits on human exposure to RF 
electromagnetic fields. The FCC also modified the process for determining 
whether a particular device or deployment is exempt from a more thorough 
analysis by replacing a service-specific list of transmitters, facilities, and 
operations for which evaluation is required with new streamlined formula-based 
criteria. The R&O also addressed how to perform evaluations where the exemption 
does not apply, and how to mitigate exposure.



Amateur radio licensees will have to determine whether any existing facilities 
previously excluded under the old rules now qualify for an exemption under the 
new rules. Most will, but some may not.



"For amateurs, the major difference is the removal of the categorical 
exclusion," Lapin said, "which means that every ham will be required to perform 
some sort of calculation, either to determine if they qualify for an exemption 
or must perform a full-fledged exposure assessment. For hams who previously 
performed exposure assessments on their stations, there is nothing more to do."



The ARRL Lab staff is available to help amateurs to make these determinations 
and, if needed, perform the necessary calculations to ensure their stations 
comply. ARRL Laboratory Manager Ed Hare, W1RFI, who helped prepare ARRL's RF 
Exposure and You book, explained it this way. "The FCC did not change any of 
the underlying rules applicable to amateur station evaluations," he said. "The 
sections of the book on how to perform routine station evaluations are still 
valid and usable, especially the many charts of common antennas at different 
heights." Hare said ARRL Lab staff also would be available to help amateurs 
understand the rules and evaluate their stations.



RF Exposure and You is available for free 
download<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arrl.org%2Ffiles%2Ffile%2FTechnology%2FRFsafetyCommittee%2F28RFSafety.pdf&data=04%7C01%7C%7C548f41d1506d438a393708d900f1dee1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637541861088655485%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=lZPJgT7ruE%2FoSGkdQ9VFhxrrHY3fIn18pUnMJVEC504%3D&reserved=0>
 from ARRL. ARRL also has an RF Safety 
page<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arrl.org%2Frf-exposure&data=04%7C01%7C%7C548f41d1506d438a393708d900f1dee1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637541861088655485%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=TtgglArQV7DlGQRNCTdcqIMUhEP8xNXG8CwR35EwE%2Fc%3D&reserved=0>
 on its website.



The ARRL RF Safety Committee is working with the FCC to update the FCC's aids 
for following human exposure rules -- OET Bulletin 65 and OET Bulletin 65 
Supplement B for Radio Amateurs. In addition, ARRL is developing tools that all 
hams can use to perform exposure assessments.

________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 

Reply via email to