Robert Citek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John Wurth wrote:
> Who said anything about being sued. Just trying to say meet your
> obligations.
If there is no legal obligation to do what you suggest, then why are we
worrying about this and why are you contacting a lawyer? We've got
bigger fish to fry, for example, getting the student/adult machines
ready. If there is a legal obligation and we don't meet it, then we run
the risk of being sued or being cited.
(I'm contacting an attorney because she works in non-profit law, is a friend
of mine, and doesn't mind answering questions. Same reason I contacted Jama
Dodson for add'l info on the grant and endowment questions.)
> What is the big deal here? Put a link to some instructions on how to
> stop the recurring payment. That's all you need.
Because it makes no sense (at best) or is misleading (at worst) to
provide instructions for something we have no control over. It would be
like me telling you how to setup or stop automatic payments from your
bank. Every bank does it differently and the bank can change how they
do it at any time.
(It doesn't have to make sense to everyone Robert. We just have to meet the
obligation. By all means make the entire first paragraph an explanation that we
have no control over this process. By the way, a friend of mine is Bob Peters,
the Pres. of United Way's Board. I'm in his office as I'm typing and he is
reading this and wondering why there's even a question that you have to put up
the instructions. From BOB: This is standard op for any non-profit.)
If you mean something else, please do provide an example of the wording
we can use. The best example I can think of is "Check with PayPal on
how to stop recurring payments."
Regards,
- Robert
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
