On Sep 12, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Dave Herholz wrote: >> And by the way Dave, 192.168.3.6 is free. =) > > What do you have as being assigned 192.168.3.5? At this point it > might be easier to reassign that one since the DVR and two client > machines have been setup to use 192.168.3.5.
Something else. =) > Matt, are you going to be in Saturday? Maybe we can work on the > network setup then. I'd also like to make sure we can remote control > the Windows machine in the front room and open up the ports for the > DVR. Also if possible, it would be nice if we could show the DVR on > the instructor machine to demo to the board, but as of now it appears > that the DVR is unreachable since the lab machines start with > 192.168.2? [1] It's Matthew, not Matt. [2] I believe I've already indicated that I plan to come in tomorrow. [3] The "Windows machine in the front room" will eventually be replaced with a Linux machine. [4] Regarding "opening up ports" for applications, well, I'd rather not. Simply put, it's a Bad Idea. [5] As far as "showing the DVR on the instructor machine," I don't know exactly what problem you're having, but it shouldn't be network- related. All the subnets still have open access to each other. More in-depth discussion tomorrow I imagine. -mej- :wq!
