Alexander Belchenko wrote: > Ian, > > from time to time I'm trying using bzr-explorer only without FAR file manager > as I'm used to. There > is still many things need to be done before it will replace command-line > completely. E.g. we need to > hook in qrun dialog now ;-). Sure. As soon as qrun lands in qbzr's trunk, I'll link it in. I'm still yet to look at it sorry. Getting bzr 2.0beta1, explorer 0.7 and fastimport 0.9 into karmic is consuming every spare minute (and then some) so far this week.
One quick thought though ... How does qrun handle interactive commands like shelve? > The bright side of bzr-explorer is: it exposes all q-dialogs for more > testing via dogfooding and now I see where qbzr developers have to improve > things (UI, algorithms > etc). Thank you! > Right. That's been the primary focus - get coverage of required features and get qbzr really rock solid via exposure. Explorer can be *way* nicer than it is but that's a secondary goal. > About pony: I don't know why but I've just thought: will be nice to post new > bugs reports from > explorer directly :-D > That's been there since explorer 0.2 I think: Help > Report a Problem. Ian C. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bzr-explorer-dev Post to : bzr-explorer-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bzr-explorer-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
