Hi Russel, On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:15 +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > I spotted the removal of olive-gtk from the bzr-gtk plugin. This seems > fine, especially if there is an intention to make Olive "pluggable" so > that there is olive-kde as well as olive-gtk. The Olive Launchpad page still mentions olive-kde, but it has mentioned that since it was created. I don't think there are any current plans to create an Olive-KDE anymore (it seems unnecessary given we already have bzr-explorer).
> I have branched lp:olive but this gives rise to some questions that I > think I need to ask rather than just experiment and potentially cause > more headaches than needed. > > 0. Does Olive have to be installed to be used or can it be used direct > from the branch? Yes, you should be able to use it directly from the branch. > 1. Installing Olive would seem to conflict with the package from Lucid, > i.e. it overwrites things installed by the package system thereby > leading (potentially) to problems. Right, but this was true when it was still a part of bzr-gtk as well. > 2. Is there going to be a PPA for Olive so that there can be a package > that would indicate the conflicts? I'm not aware of any plans for this (yet), though I expect we'll package Olive for Debian and Ubuntu. Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- bzr-gtk mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.canonical.com/mailman/listinfo/bzr-gtk
