Hi John, On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:52 PM, John Arbash Meinel <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote: [snip] > > I think for people doing the updates, it would be best if we could have > one packaging branch, and then do: > > make windows-installers > > Or > > make mac-installers > > It depends on how easily things can be updated for something like > buildout. But it seems that having 1 place to update all of the external > dependencies would be a good thing.
We can't do 'make mac-installers' ATM, mainly because building the OS X installer is a manual process. I automated most of the 'building' process, fetch depedencies, patch them and build the mpkg for each one, and also the DMG packaging, but not the build/assembly of installer itself. It might be automated for the 10.5 installer as the installer description is a bunch of xml files, but I didn't found a way to do that for the 10.4 installer which is a binary format :( Regards, _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bzr-mac Post to : bzr-mac@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bzr-mac More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
