On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Brad House wrote: > >> So, is this patch being rejected then? > > > I've not seen anyone reject it, so I'd say no it isn't. It's just not being > handled (yet). > > I'm sorry for that, but we seem to have a shortage of developers with energy > and time to spend on c-ares. There has primarly been David Drysdale over the > last few years and a single man on the job isn't good. I'm personally > certainly guilty of not spending much time on c-ares these days. >
I confess I was leaving this one for Daniel, as he'd already commented once and he knows a lot more about the autoconf stuff.... > > Participants on this mailing list can help out by commenting/reviewing > patches or even voluntering for push access to get git repo to help the > project forward. > > -- > > / daniel.haxx.se
