> ... but otherwise most are pretty stale.
As submitter of one of those 'stale' pull requests - #96 - this is
frustrating to read.
Understood that we all are busy people, but still: in the case of my
pull request and several others, staleness is induced only by maintainer
inactivity. So it is, as I say, frustrating to see it suggested that
this is itself a good reason for continuing to allow such PRs to languish.
As I wrote in a similar thread before a previous release: in the
particular case of #96 I wouldn't be overly upset to see it rejected -
and I would prefer that over leaving it dangling indefinitely.
Some of the open pull requests are indeed complex and I recognise that
they'll require real thought to be dealt with properly. It's a shame
that there isn't enough maintainer resource to deal with this - perhaps
the project should be looking for new co-maintainers? - but such is life.
However several PRs look as though they really could be dealt with very
cheaply at this point. I suggest:
* #47 just wants accepting: it's obviously harmless, someone was
bothered enough to submit a fix, let's do them the favour of taking it.
(It's particularly sad that this one gets to be two years old).
* #57 just wants rejecting, per the comments explaining that it's
unnecessary
* #158 looks like it wants rejecting, per the comments in #157
* #170 just wants accepting: it's another that's obviously harmless.
Leaving this sort of thing dangling can only discourage contributors.
That lot (and #96) would be enough to close a third of the open pull
requests. Isn't this worthwhile?
On 05/02/2018 14:44, Brad House wrote:
It seems like there's been a lot of fixes for Windows and Android
since our last official release. I think it might be a good idea to
start release planning for another release. Any thoughts on this or
any PRs that should be addressed first? I think it might be good to
see gjasny finish up PR#168 for the release, but otherwise most are
pretty stale.
-Brad
