Randall Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Is there a FAQ showing how to do this? I tried about a year ago but gave up
> do to lack of information.

I don't know if there's a FAQ, but there were these recent posts on
the issue to the mailing list:

| From: Kai Lanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Subject: UW imapd and InstantSSL certs
| 
| 
| We currently run imapd-2002e and support SSL authentication using
| a certificate from Verisign.  That cert is about to expire, and we're
| replacing it with certs from InstantSSL (much much cheaper).
| 
| It was easy to prepare the Verisign certs for use with imapd -- just
| concatenate the server private key and the host certificate into
| a file called imapd.pem and stick that in /local/ssl/certs/:
| 
|     cat server.key pangea.crt > imapd.pem
| 
| InstantSSL gives us *two* certificates: a host certificate and a CA
| certificate, i.e. a Comodo intermediate certificate.  Can the UW imapd
| work with this certificate-plus-intermediate configuration?  What do 
| I need to do to prepare our new imapd.pem?
| 
| -- Kai Lanz      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

| From: Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Subject: Re: UW imapd and InstantSSL certs
| 
| On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Kai Lanz wrote:
| > InstantSSL gives us *two* certificates: a host certificate and a CA
| > certificate, i.e. a Comodo intermediate certificate.  Can the UW imapd
| > work with this certificate-plus-intermediate configuration?  What do
| > I need to do to prepare our new imapd.pem?
| 
| I don't know enough about this to give a guaranteed answer.  Hey, I just 
| wrote the code, what makes anyone thing I know anything! :-)
| 
| But anyway, it sounds to me that your host certificate is what would 
| become your imapd.pem (and is a private key for imapd).
| 
| Separately, you want to install the CA certificate, including making the 
| funny symlink via
|   ln -s Comodo.pem `/usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl x509 -noout -hash < Comodo.pem`.0
| (substitute the CA certificate's file name for "Comodo.pem") which will 
| make a symlink with an 8-digit hex value and an extension of .0 that 
| points to the CA certificate's PEM file
| 
| The CA certificate is for Pine to be able to validate what IMAP offers; so 
| the CA certificate should be publicly-readable and the imapd.pem should be 
| read-protected.
| 
| -- Mark --

| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Seymour)
| Subject: Re: UW imapd and InstantSSL certs
| 
| Kai Lanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > 
| > 
| [snip]
| > 
| > InstantSSL gives us *two* certificates: a host certificate and a CA
| > certificate, i.e. a Comodo intermediate certificate.  Can the UW imapd
| > work with this certificate-plus-intermediate configuration?  What do 
| > I need to do to prepare our new imapd.pem?
| 
| Luckily (for you) I just went through this.  (UW IMAP's pop3d and
| Postfix SMTP-AUTH/TLS/STARTTLS)
| 
| There will be four components to what you'll have to put in imapd.pem,
| when using InstantSSL/Comodo certs:
| 
|    Server private key
|    Your server cert.
|    N-year Comodo intermediate cert.
|    GTE N-year root (?) cert.
| 
| I don't know if the order's important, but that's the order I put them
| in.
| 
| Hope this helped.
| 
| (Btw: I've been quite pleased with InstantSSL.)
| 
| Jim
| 

| From: Kai Lanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Subject: SUMMARY: UW imapd and InstantSSL certs
| 
| 
| Thanks to Mark Crispin and Jim Seymour for their quick responses.
| I had asked about setting up the imapd.pem file using the several
| certificates we get from InstantSSL.
| 
| Jim's suggestion seems to be working for us:
| 
| >There will be four components to what you'll have to put in imapd.pem,
| >when using InstantSSL/Comodo certs:
| >
| >   Server private key
| >   Your server cert.
| >   N-year Comodo intermediate cert.
| >   GTE N-year root (?) cert.
| 
| I catted these four files into a new imapd.pem for our server:
| 
| # cat server.key ourhost_domain_edu.crt ComodoSecurityServicesCA.crt \
| GTECyberTrustGlobalRoot.crt > imapd.pem.new
| 
| Tests with Eudora and the MacOS X Mail.app clients worked as expected.
| I'll probably set up the symlink Mark mentioned as well.
| 

So there you go, Randall, hope this helps.

Jim

Reply via email to