Gareth, Thanks for the correction. So how do you suggest for xsd validation (without an instance document)?
Thanks, Elisha > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yes, there actually is a theoretically better way. The only problem is > that > > it did not work for me when I tried it before, and I do not like > > recommending methods that I have not had success with. > > The Schema for Schemas is is special schema that is allowed to do things > that others are not (such as define the base types). You therefore > cannot use it. In addition to this there are *many* rules that are not > expressed in that schema that are in the text of the specification. Take > a look in the archives if you want more info - this has been extensively > discussed before. > > Cheers, > > Gareth > > -- > Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing > +44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
