Ah, is that in CVS? I'm not seeing it anywhere in the 2.6.0 release.
Scott Morgan
David Cargill wrote:
Hi Scott, Trying using decodeToXMLByte instead of decode.
Regards, David A. Cargill XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab (905) 413-2371, tie 969 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .co.uk> To [email protected] 04/20/2005 11:45 cc AM Subject Base64::decode to XMLCh* - why? Please respond to c-dev
It makes no sense to me, Base 64 is for encoding binary data, when you decode it (regardless of whether the encoded source is in UTF16 (i.e. from a parsed XML file DOMNode) or ASCII form) the output should be bytes.
But the decode method that takes XMLCh* as it's source returns XMLCh* so that {0x01, 0x02, 0x03} becomes (0x01, 0x00, 0x02, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00 }. You have to transliterate the encoded data down to ASCII form to send to the XMLByte* decode method which seems a bit pointless.
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Scott Morgan
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
