> http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html > > Taken in by those arguments, I've gone for the monolithic make in > large part. There are separate makefiles for obj, src, tests.
Some of those arguments don't really seem to hold that much with an autotools-driven build. There's certainly not a significant problem with over-recompilation that I've ever noticed, and that would be the worst of the problems that paper highlights to me. I think the benefits of a modular set of understandable makefiles far outweigh any speed concerns (note that machines are a lot faster now...), but YMMV. -- Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
