On Jun 10, 2005, at 9:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I see on Windows, at least, XMLSize_t ends up being a
typedef
for unsigned long, rather than size_t, and that's why I was concerned.
I believe the intent of XMLSize_t is that it match whatever size_t
would be on a particular platform. size_t should be a 32 bit unsigned
on Win32, and 64 bits on Win64?
If our Windows headers typedef XMLSize_t to anything but "size_t", I
would think that's a bug...?
-jdb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
