> The above can easily be expressed in a schema that allows the root > element to contain any-namespace-elements, so why don't you want to do > > it? Or is it important that your root element itself has an arbitrary > name?
Yes, I think, this is important. What I want to do, is to serialize a part of a tree and send the file over the network. The receiving application will parse and validate the file and then insert the result into its own tree. Regards, Bernhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
