On May 26, 2006, at 5:41 AM, Alberto Massari wrote:
Hi Scott,
At 12:27 AM 5/24/2006 -0400, Scott Cantor wrote:
> Sorry about that. Fixed now.
No problem...unrelated question...is the libtool archive
(libxerces.la)
intended to be installed and/or packaged? rpmbuild complains
because make
install is moving it into lib64 but it's not listed in the %files
section in
the spec file.
My projects are mostly yanking the .la file in a post-install-hook
so the
specfiles ignore them, but I'm temporarily just adding a rm -f to
the spec
file to get it building so I can verify if the 64 bit packaging
works.
I have committed a new version of the spec file that removes
the .la file from the lib directory.
Sorry I didn't get a chance to respond to Scott's earlier message. Is
the issue that we shouldn't be installing the libxerces.la file at
all? Any arguments for or against?
James.
Thanks,
Alberto
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
