Mannion, Enda wrote:
> I don't understand, if I can write this Unicode character then why can I
> not read it.
Enda, (sorry, overlooked the comma)
I didn't argue about reading, but about transcoding. After reading, the
character is hold in XMLCh, the utf-16 representation required by the
standards. If this character has a representation in the local (libc)
encoding, xercesc::XMLString::transcode delivers the local representation.
> I read using this code and xmlval = ""
>
> n = node->getFirstChild()->getNodeValue();
> xmlval = xercesc::XMLString::transcode(n);
Did you check the value of 'n'?
HTH,
Axel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
