[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539105
 ] 

Fernando commented on XERCESC-1755:
-----------------------------------

This issue was raised from comments from my team, and I did not check this bug 
myself until now.
When analyzing the issue, I have realized there is no such a problem, and there 
was a misunderstanding with the schemas.
My apologies. Thanks for your attention anyway. This issue can be closed.

> Abstract types in substitution group
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESC-1755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1755
>             Project: Xerces-C++
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>         Environment: Unix - Linux (SUSE)
>            Reporter: Fernando
>
> I wish to report a bug that, to my understanding, creates a problem of 
> compatibility with XML 1.0.
> Let it be a substitution group, which basic type is an abstract type A. Let 
> it be a member B of that substitution group, which happen to be an abstract 
> type too. Obviously, the second abstract type B is no a final type; this 
> second abstract type B must be substituted by other final valid types.
> The reason for including the second abstract B as part of the substituion 
> group for abstract type A is to somehow structure and hierarchise the whole 
> substitution group.
> The bug I wish to report is that the second abstract type B produces a 
> problem, since it is not allowed to be part of any substitution group.
> According to XML 1.0 recommendation (that Xerces is supposed to be 
> complaiance with), an abstract type present in a substitution group should 
> not be a problem, since there is no restriction for this.
> Could someone please check if this problem with Xerces is actually a bug to 
> be solved in next version? Otherwise, could someone please let me know in 
> which part of the XML 1.0 recommendation there is any constrain to abstract 
> types as part of substitution groups?
> Thanks a lot.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to