Hi Dave,
Thanks for your analysis. So I guess I have two questions - why doesn't
the illegal syntax (*:car) give an error in Xerces-C, and why don't the
legal syntaxes (below) work?
David Bertoni wrote:
John Snelson wrote:
1)
<xs:unique name="vinUnique">
<xs:selector xpath="ns:car"/>
<xs:field xpath="@vin"/>
</xs:unique>
Xerces-C 2.8: Valid
Xerces-C 3.0: Valid
5)
<xs:unique name="vinUnique">
<xs:selector xpath="."/>
<xs:field xpath="ns:car/@vin"/>
</xs:unique>
Xerces-C 2.8: Valid
Xerces-C 3.0: Valid
I believe the example document I attached should fail both of these
uniqueness constraints.
John
--
John Snelson, Oracle Corporation http://snelson.org.uk/john
Berkeley DB XML: http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-db/xml
XQilla: http://xqilla.sourceforge.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
