Hi,
I discovered a bug in the IconvGNUWrapper yesterday where a Mutex was
being default constructed with the global MemoryManager instance. In
trying to fix it, I noticed that explicit memory management was never
pushed into the APIs, because we didn't want to break everything in the
2.x code base.
Are there any objections if I make some API changes that will result in
explicit use of the MemoryManager class when creating a transcoding
service and creating transcoders?
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]