Hi,

I discovered a bug in the IconvGNUWrapper yesterday where a Mutex was being default constructed with the global MemoryManager instance. In trying to fix it, I noticed that explicit memory management was never pushed into the APIs, because we didn't want to break everything in the 2.x code base.

Are there any objections if I make some API changes that will result in explicit use of the MemoryManager class when creating a transcoding service and creating transcoders?

Dave

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to