It actually did work!! Thanks a lot Alberto. I just don't understand why it did not work the first time, but the result's here : ) Thanks again!!!
radada wrote: > > Hi and thx for your answer. > Since the transcode uses a shared memory, do I have to call a release each > time I call a transcode? > FYI I did try this (callin a release for each transcode) in the orginal > program, but it didn't work. > I'll give it a try with this code and post the result here. > Thanks again : ) > > > Alberto Massari wrote: >> >> Hi, >> you are not releasing a lot of XMLString::transcode calls. >> >> Alberto >> >> radada wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> for my job, an XML parser was implemented using xerces 2.4 (AIX 5.1), >>> mais >>> we always had a memory leak. >>> Considering the complexity of the code, I tried to redesign a simple XML >>> parser using the 3.0.1. xerces version. >>> I reused a sample code from the xerces site "Dom programming guide" (--> >>> http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/program-dom-3.htm) >>> Here is my code (well, a part of it) >>> [..] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Xerces-3.0.1-C%2B%2B-memory-leak-tp23151106p23152823.html Sent from the Xerces - C - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
