On 29/04/2019 15:34, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
The vote to migrate the Xerces-C++ repository from SVN to Git has passed and I would like to discuss the next step.
Sorry for the delay in replying; I've been away on holiday for the last week.
As well as through the Xerces-C++ SVN repository to see what we've got: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/c/?root=Apache-SVN Based on that I would suggest that we have the following repositories: xerces-cxx.git xerces-cxx-web.git xerces-cxx-admin.git
Do we need "-cxx" as a suffix here, or would "-c" be better? xalan-c retained the "-c", and it might be better for continuity to retain the "-c" since this was what xerces-c was traditionally using.
For the first repository I propose the following straightforward mapping: heads/master <- trunk heads/xerces-2 <- branches/xerces-2 heads/xerces-2.8 <- branches/xerces-2.8 heads/xerces-3.0 <- branches/xerces-3.0 heads/xerces-3.1 <- branches/xerces-3.1
This mapping looks perfect to me.
I think we should try to migrate the release tags (the ones in the Xerces-C_X_Y_Z form). I also wouldn't mind converting them to the now well-established vX.Y.Z form.
Agreed we should migrate the release tags as a requirement. So long as the tags are present in some form, I have no major preference regarding the naming scheme. Since git supports dots in tag names, I wouldn't be averse to vX.Y.Z, which is a bit more natural.
Roger and everyone else, does this sound reasonable/doable?
Definitely. Thanks for investigating the possibilities. Kind regards, Roger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
