--- Paul Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/30/06, Ray Devore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- "Victor A. Wagner Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Nico: > > [malloc and new in the same program] > > > > >What I wanted to express is that you should not > > > >rely on such mixes to work under all > circumstances. > > > > > > Again I say. The standard REQUIRES it to work. > If > > > you work with broken compilers, I can't offer > any suggestions > > > > > > > Victor, > > > > I am definitely NOT an expert on the standard. > Are > > you saying the standard requires malloc() and > delete > > to work together, and it requires new and free() > to > > work together? > > > What Victor is saying is that you should be able to, > in the same (C++) > program, free() malloc()'d memory, and delete new'd > object. > > As I've previously pointed out, free()ing new'd > memory and deleteing > malloc()'d memory is undefined behaviour. > > > > -- > PJH
Thanks for the clarification. Ray __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
