At 05:46 2007-01-23, mr_gees100_peas wrote: > >>C is, and has been useless ever since C++ became standardized. and > >>I'll say it again, There is NO point in writing anything in C >these >>days. C++ is simply a better language, period > >What you say is so true. there is no excuse to even lookat C whe C++ >exist. None what so ever. Now all we have to do is convince the >manufactures of millions of devices like 8 and 16 bit microcontrollers >that are used in every day mundane things like microwaves, dvd >players, cable boxes and a hord of security devices to accept this >absolute thruth.
Name one. I've been using small devices in projects like that and "surprise, surprise, sergeant" g++ compiles just fine for them. >We also have to convinve all those tester >manufacturers like advantest and teradyne that make testing computer >componets possible to aslo acept this fact. Last but not least we have >to convince every single non windows operating system programmer who >only care about speed and small code foot print of this infallable >thruth. it is disinformation to assert that C generates smaller code, sir. >The nerve of those people, small unbloated code bleh!! what a >bunch of boloney. Who needs conpact and efficient code on memory and >computing limited devices these days? I do, and I've been doing this a heck of a lot longer than you have >To unsubscribe, send a blank message to ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
