On 2/1/07, Brett W. McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 2/1/07, Thomas Hruska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Herring wrote:
> > On 2/1/07, shubhrajyoti datta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> How ?Multiples of 2 is understandable but 3
> >> please explain..
> >>
> >
> >
> > x/2 + x/4 = x/3.
> >
> > Basic maths I would have thought....
>
> Plug in 8 for the above formula:
>
> 8/2 + 8/4 = 8/3
> 4 + 2 = 2.66
> 6 = 2.66
>
> Someone needs his morning coffee...

Paul forgot to say he was using the new 'nullity' concept...


Or was simply confusing multiplication and division....

I'll go back to bed :)

--
PJH

#706281 +(1868)- [X]
TriPod11: bush ain't THAT bad...he kinda knows what he's doin
idaredbeet08: Please, Monica Lewenski had more President in her than George
Bush ever will.

Reply via email to