Pedro Izecksohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... If I would write the C standard, or I would make > restrictions to use "true" or I would not declare it at all > and leave it being any non zero. > > But this is my actual position: Ten days ago I thought > the current true definition a good thing. Until it confused > me.
Your confusion was over paradigms. C has a lot of confusing paradigms. It can take newbies months to properly understand a simple expression like... *s++ In terms of your reaction to the confusion, I'm reminded of Victor's old sigblock... :-) The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law" -- Peter
