[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 10/31/07, Vic Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jacob Lund Fisker wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, camdoclark wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> One time, when I went online to find a tutorial for c++, I found one. I >>>> used it on my compiler and it worked. When I use the other book I have >>>> that didn't work. What I found out is this: >>>> >>>> Tutorial online header was: >>>> >>>> #include <iostream> >>>> >>>> Book: >>>> >>>> #include <iostream.h> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is it that my compiler doesn't support iostream.h? >>>> >>>> P.S. I am using Dev-C++ as my compiler. >>>> >>>> >>> Your book is old? iostream.h has been deprecated. >>> >> Actually, iostream.h was _never_ part of the standard, therefore it >> canNOT be deprecated. >> >> > > > > i dont know if u mean 'iostream.h' is not part of standard that's _exactly_ what I said. iostream.h is NOT and was NEVER part of the standard.... you can't deprecate stuff that "doesn't exist" > but the > > > > > 'iostream' then u are right > >> but if u are saying that <iostream> is not the part >> >> >> of standard then check ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E) pg. 599 >> > perhaps the problem isn't reading/writing C++ but reading English. > >> I don't know why your >> >>> compiler does not not support iostream.h though (keep in mind that >>> iostream!=iostream.h). >>> >>> >> why should it support iostream.h? It was never part of the standard. >> There is no definition for what should have been in any particular >> iostream.h >> My compiler, for example, doesn't have an iostream.h in it's headers. >> >>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
