hi again. thanks for your answers.
not sure I got the full meaning of what you wrote. will try to come up with an example... --- In [email protected], "Paul Herring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:40 PM, oriporat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello again. > > and thanks for all the answers !! > > > > continuing from my question- > > is a=b the same like *a=*b ?? > > In that they're assigning like with like, yes. In what they're > actually assigning, no. The former is assigning pointers, the second > ints. > > > *a == &a ? > > int = pointer to pointer to int - likely get a warning from your > compiler on that one. > > > and *b==&b or > > Ditto. > > > I got it all mixed up? > > if a and b were initialized in the begining with NULL(\0), > > Then any of *a= or *b= will likely result in a seg-fault or similar on > most systems. > > > what was the difference ? > > Which book are you using to learn from? > > -- > PJH > > A man walks into a bakery, points and the girl behind the counter > "Is that a macaroon or a meringue?" > "No, you're right, it's a macaroon." >
