Mickey Mathieson wrote: > JUst trying to be helpfull. I don't understand your > logic however. Returning a value makes it VERY CLEAR > what the function does - a pointer to a pointer is NOT > very clear. And another programer might not understand > why pointer to pointer is requirred. >
There is a very easy solution: write a comment! You can even use a Doxygen comment to create HTML documentation about how your class works and why you have a double pointer. -- John Gaughan
