--- In [email protected], Thomas Hruska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > b = (UInt64)(((UInt32)a) * ((UInt32)a));
Would this be even safer: b = (UInt64)a * (UInt64)a; ?
--- In [email protected], Thomas Hruska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > b = (UInt64)(((UInt32)a) * ((UInt32)a));
Would this be even safer: b = (UInt64)a * (UInt64)a; ?