Jos Timanta Tarigan wrote: > Hi, > > Im curious is it usual to make an util class to contain methods that are > going to be used frequently generally? is there any proper format for this > class? im planning to make a util.cpp file with some methods, and include the > cpp file in every classes. but i wonder since i havent seen an included .cpp > files(all included are header files) >
What you are looking for is a class that has only static methods. However, the bigger question is why are you using a class when you can just make stand-alone functions? If you want to group them you can use a namespace. This has the advantage of being extensible, in that you can put other stuff in the namespace later while to extend a class you get into types and junk that are not important for a utility class. -- John Gaughan
