It looks a lot like a formula to me.
Data structures are nice in networking, but they're not needed.
Usually we refer to things in values of bits and bytes.
You can cover a block of data of 64 bits and divide it in to shorts, which is 
basically how my college teacher explains it.
I've had a couple years experience with coding so I can adapt easily enough, 
but even the newer kids don't have issues, or so it seems.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Thomas Hruska 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:13 PM
  Subject: Re: [c-prog] Re: Need Help in Programming


  namasteall2000 wrote:
  > Bret - you are right - this is part of my homework of networking 
  > course. I haven't done much in C - that's why need help. I want 
  > somebody to guide me the steps - I will try to do coding of my own. 
  > 
  > I just need flowchart (not exactly flowchart) kind of thing where I 
  > can understand the flow of the program.
  > 
  > Thanks

  You might be in the wrong course then. Networking can be a fairly 
  advanced topic depending on how low-level you get. You should have data 
  structures and be fairly comfortable with using the C/C++ language under 
  your belt first. Networking applications open a whole new can of worms 
  (application security, IPC, multithreading, etc.) that you probably 
  aren't ready for yet.

  The problem itself, though, seems more like some sort of mathematical 
  problem than actual networking. However, the problem description seems 
  insufficient. You have two unrelated variables T and N without any 
  logical statement connecting them (unless I missed something). This is 
  what is likely causing you confusion: The variable N is suddenly 
  referenced out of the blue. If that is the entire problem description, 
  ask your teacher for clarification.

  -- 
  Thomas Hruska
  CubicleSoft President
  Ph: 517-803-4197

  *NEW* MyTaskFocus 1.1
  Get on task. Stay on task.

  http://www.CubicleSoft.com/MyTaskFocus/



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to