Guess that would make sense, and I didn't see it. I just keep seeing this thread with clever answers that consist of "clever code," and stopped reading. :) On Jan 2, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Paul Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Tyler Littlefield <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not quite sure why all this study is being put into something like > > this. Why not > > just use the < sign or functions like thomas pointed out? Writing clever > > code is just > > going to break things in the end. > > Because it's either > a) a homework question in a country that doesn't particularly > encourage it's students to adhere to even general C standards or > b) an interview question in a country that thinks it's cute to ask > such question of potential programmers. > > I do believe I pointed out these truisms a couple of weeks ago on this > thread and wondered why my "I hope you don't work with me" comment got > any replies. > > -- > PJH > > http://shabbleland.myminicity.com/ > http://www.chavgangs.com/register.php?referer=9375 > http://www.kongregate.com/?referrer=Shabble > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a blank message to <mailto:[email protected]>.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/c-prog/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/c-prog/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
