> I have also tried creating a sortPaths() function.
>
> // Calling procedure
> obj.sortPaths();
>
> // sortPaths
> void Entry::sortPaths()
> {
> sort(Entry::compare_Paths);
> }
>
> I get 2 errors:
> No matching function for call to 'Entry::sort(<unknown type>)'
> Candidates are void Entry::sort(int(*)(void*, void*))
Rick, this is not really a comprehensive answer, but would your second example
here work if you didn't use the scope resolution? As in...
// sortPaths
void Entry::sortPaths()
{
sort(compare_Paths);
}
You're already in the right scope once you get in sortPaths, which is why
you're able to call sort without scope resolution.
I'm going to be lazy and link you a page made by guys who have forgotten more
about this than I'll ever know.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/FastDelegate.aspx
The part about member function pointers is just past the introduction, and they
go into pretty great detail about why member function pointers are more
complicated.
