And test and test and be aware that not every client can accept per default message-response as large as 65536 bytes (16 bit pointers eventually). Also chunking and streaming architectures/implemntation should ring alarm bells. Josef
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Emanuele Benedetti [mailto:be...@mclink.it] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011 09:43 An: Apache AXIS C User List Betreff: Re: Guththila vs libxml2 In data 09 febbraio 2011 alle ore 20:00:19, Nandika Jayawardana <jayaw...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Guththila parser is based on pull model and should be slightly faster > than > libxml as explained by the article. In the last few years, Guththila > became > the default parser and hence undergone good amount of testing. Hence, you > can use either parser for your usage. Some times ago I had to recompile axis2 with libxml2 support rather than Guththila as the latter silently discard messages bigger than 128K. I don't know if the sistuation is changed with the last versions (I'm speaking of a couple of years ago when was just out the axis2c version 1.6). SO if you plan to receive messages bigger than that, make some tests. -- Saluti Emanuele --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-user-h...@axis.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-user-h...@axis.apache.org
