I never really used the "unofficial" version (recently discovered it, hence too late), but when fixing a few memory leaks in the official version I looked through it roughly. My understanding is that they branched off the official version and fixed quite a few memory leaks and corruptions plus added some features. What I have seen looked quite reasonable - so as a summary I'd hope that it is at least not worse than the official version :-)
And, they wrote something that they started the unofficial branch due to the refusal of the official maintainers to adopt some things ... so, if somebody asked me :-) I'd strongly vote for merging the unofficial version back into the official one! Regards, tge On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 09:28 +0000, andreas.voel...@swisslife.ch wrote: > Hi all > > I'm looking into using Axis2/C to integrate our old legacy C > application with the rest of our environment. > > Currently I'm wondering, if I should use 1.6.0 or if axis2c-unofficial > (https://code.google.com/p/axis2c-unofficial/) would be a better > option. > > Can anyone tell me, if axis2c-unofficial is stable enough to be used > in a productive environment? And if it will be possible to switch back > to the official versions, once there is a new official version of > axis2c? > > Thanks > Regards > Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
