Hey,
On 10/24/06, Jesse Pelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, thanks. Strikes me as an odd and unfortunate
>omission, I have to say.
Perhaps an implementation would be incorporated into the project if
offered. ("Perhaps" because there may be good reason(s) why it hasn't
been done before.)
It's not in the code, because as far as I am aware no one has
requested it, nor offere it to be included. It shouldn't be too
dificult to code following the examples of the existing InputSource
classes, and I'm sure that we could include it in the codebase.
Cheers, jas.
