Thanks for the response :)
--
> The only way you can test for a grammar to be valid is by loading it
using loadGrammar.
> Using the DTD or the XMLSchema provided by the specs will in any case
result in less validation checks than the ones listed in the specs itself.
--
Hmm, but then I need to load it twice, once as DOM, and once as grammar.
I could live with less checks, however, I want to catch things like
elements that are in the wrong place or wrongly spelt attributes that my
DOM scanning code doesn't see because its not looking for such errors.
Is there a way to validate a Schema directly via DTD or Schema, without
using loadGrammar?
Cheers,
Uwe
Alberto Massari amassari-at-datadirect.com |xerces-c-users mailing list|
schrieb:
Hi Uwe,
At 23.22 02/01/2007 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
My application processes XML Schema files on the DOM level (.xsd
files are parsed with XercesDOMParser::parse()). However, to detect
user errors in the schema files, I'd like to turn on validation for
them.
Is that at all possible?
The only way you can test for a grammar to be valid is by loading it
using loadGrammar.
Using the DTD or the XMLSchema provided by the specs will in any case
result in less validation checks than the ones listed in the specs
itself.
Alberto
I ran some tests with the schema for schemas, which XercesDOMParser
rejects (I assume that's because its built-in types are redefined). I
also tried to feed the schema DTD into the parser, without success
(Xerces seems to expect a schema rather than a DTD when it requests a
resource for a namespace identifier)
Can anyone point me into the right direction?
I can post my test code as well if that helps.
Cheers,
Uwe
--------------------------------------
Protect yourself from spam,
use http://sneakemail.com
