Hi, > Benchmarks are a very tricky thing. Are those Java parsers all > full-conformant? How the machines on which those parsers were tested > differ from yours? I would not trust a benchmark that is not carefully > designed and controlled.
ok, thanks for this statement. I was talking about these benchmarks (JDKs builtin SAX parser). http://www.ximpleware.com/benchmark1.html (the SAX values, Java SDK > Xerces-C can be very sensitive to several factors, including the compiler > used to build the binaries, and the OS memory allocation functions. Since > you don't mention your OS or compiler, it's hard to say if there's anything > you can do to get better results. I'm running Ubuntu Linux 6.06 on a 2.0GHz Dua Core with 1GB RAM available. I compiled the xerces libraries from source, using gcc/g++ and optimization level -03. I was just wondering about this performance difference as my processor is even better as the one used in the experiments above and they used a Java system instead of C++. If you have any hints on how to speed up my system I would be really interested in... Michael _________________________________________________________________________ In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten! Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114
