If it is not the intended behavior why to define hierarchical categories then? It was possible and ok in version 5.
On 18 mai 2011, at 22:19, "Vo Minh Thu \(OpenERP\)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ruud Riem-Vis, > > The behavior you are describing is not a limition (and not a bug). The > intended usage of the field 'category' on the search view is to filter > on a specific category. > > The search view is specified at > openerp/addons/base/res/partner/partner_view.xml:342 and use, > purposefuly, a simple 'field' element. > > It is possible to get the behavior you want by changing the search view > and using an attribute operator="child_of". > > Well, actually it works for many2one fields but the category on a > partner is a many2many and a bug exists. The proposed patch above should > correct that. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740799 > > Title: > [filtering] does not support hierarchy > > Status in OpenERP Server: > Fix Committed > > Bug description: > In v6, the filtering cannot be performed on "view"-type items in the > category field of a partner for example. Consider the following case: > > Define partner categories as follows: > > man > man->thin > man->thick > woman > woman->thin > woman->thick > > Now if you have a set of partners, you can define a filter on "thin", > on "thick" but not on "man" or "woman" or "woman thick". This means > that you cannot find back a thin woman in a filter for example. > > I believe this is an unwanted limitation of the filter mechanism. > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-server/+bug/740799/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740799 Title: [filtering] does not support hierarchy Status in OpenERP Server: Fix Committed Bug description: In v6, the filtering cannot be performed on "view"-type items in the category field of a partner for example. Consider the following case: Define partner categories as follows: man man->thin man->thick woman woman->thin woman->thick Now if you have a set of partners, you can define a filter on "thin", on "thick" but not on "man" or "woman" or "woman thick". This means that you cannot find back a thin woman in a filter for example. I believe this is an unwanted limitation of the filter mechanism. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~c2c-oerpscenario Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~c2c-oerpscenario More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
