According to the GHC trac, it appears that CLDouble is slated for re-inclusion after a proper implementation. The FFI requires it, so they'll hopefully progress relatively quickly.
Given that, I think it would be best to avoid drastic changes in c2hs to support this (hopefully) temporary situation. I wouldn't mind a fail with error as suggested. John On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Manuel, other interested c2hs people, > > GHC 6.12 removes the CLDouble type from the FFI libs. Of course this > means c2hs currently does not compile. The question is what level we > should handle this at. Do we also stop recognising and translating long > double in C code? Perhaps we should recognise it but fail with an error > message to the effect that there is no corresponding Haskell type. > > Suggestions welcome. > > Duncan > > _______________________________________________ > C2hs mailing list > C2hs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/c2hs > _______________________________________________ C2hs mailing list C2hs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/c2hs
