On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 16:48 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Duncan Coutts > <duncan.cou...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:56 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Duncan Coutts > >> <duncan.cou...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 10:48 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Duncan Coutts > >> >> <duncan.cou...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:15 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > >> >> >> I have a library that uses stdcall on windows and ccall on other > >> >> >> platforms. I found this bug report: > >> >> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/c2hs/ticket/17 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Does c2hs handle this case correctly yet? The bug has not been close > >> >> >> although a patch was submitted. I'm not sure how to interpret that. > >> >> >> > >> I'd prefer to stick to things that are cabal installable, so if you > >> don't mind making a new release that would be my preferred solution. > > > > > > By the way, do let us know if the current version actually works now for > > your use case. > > Will do. I told the author of the OpenCL bindings that I would try > his bindings (hopefully) by this weekend. I know he uses c2hs but I > don't know if he uses the fun macro. Judah also has a binding > (hsOpenCL) that does use the fun macro. So even if the bindings I > plan on trying out do not make use of this feature, I can try Judah's > bindings and report back.
Great thanks. BTW, it should not matter whether you uses 'fun' or 'call' hooks. What is important is that the C header file declare the calling convention using GNU C attribute syntax. Duncan _______________________________________________ C2hs mailing list C2hs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/c2hs
