On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:05:36 +0900, Esa Ilari Vuokko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 8/17/06, Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We don't yet have a generic preprocessor support system. It is indeed
part of the plan. I know I'll need it for Gtk2Hs.
What about UserHooks.hookedPreProcessors? The code seemd like
it could work, but I haven't tested it.
I think changing Setup.(l)hs definition with UserHook
is very strong, but this approach is too complex to
specify just generating file from other resources
by only one tool.
I think cabal must support to write using self
preproccesser definition in *.cabal files like this.
name: hdirect
version: 0.1
(snip)
othermodules: ComPrim, AutoPrim
generatable: ComPrim
g-sources: ComPrim.idl
g-tool: ihc
g-option: -fno-export-list -fappend-interface-short-name
-fno-qualified-names -fno-imports -fno-export-lists -fkeep-hresult
-fout-pointers-are-not-refs
generatable: AutoPrim
g-sources: AutoPrim.idl
g-tool: ihc
g-option: -fno-qualified-names -fno-imports -fno-export-lists
-fkeep-hresult -fout-pointers-are-not-refs
This is rough sketch. But I think this is useful for
discussion about "Cabal with Generating files".
--
shelarcy <shelarcy capella.freemail.ne.jp>
http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/
_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
