On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:06:55AM -0700, Isaac Jones wrote: > I still have some debate about whether this patch should go in; it > assumes a model of package registration where you have a config file > (as opposed to a directory) which isn't the case for nhc or Hugs.
I don't know anything about packages in nhc or Hugs, but if they use directories, isn't the obvious thing to interpret the "ghc-pkg-config-file" as the package directory? Andrew _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
