Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
We're all assuming here that HaXml deliberately decided to change the
interface. Is that really true? (only Malcolm can answer)
Yes, it's true. Even a non-Malcolm such as myself can answer this,
because of the magnitude of the changes from 1.13 to 1.17. HaXml is
somewhere in the process of a big spring cleaning.
The real question that only Malcolm can answer is how far through the
process of tidying up it is. That bears on whether it's worth bringing
haxr up to date; if there's more churn ahead, the answer is probably
"not yet".
If an experimental HaXml version was added to Hackage, it should be
tagged as such in some way. A cheapo way to do that is to call the
package "HaXml-experimental" or some such.
/Björn
_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
